What Counts as “Common Sense”?

We often treat common sense as neutral: a conclusion so obvious it needs no explanation. But what feels obvious can rest on learned assumptions about what matters, what causes what, or whose account is credible.

When two people interpret the same event differently, how would you tell whether they disagree about the evidence—or about the framework they’re using to make sense of it? What question might reveal that framework without turning the conversation into a contest over who is rational?